Hi Ojior,
there can different reasons,
1. indicators of WBS, e.g. 'Acc asst element', Billing element'. Check them with the used strategy in customizing mentioned by Gokul.
2. Certain status, e.g. closed, prevent the rules generated.
3. WBS with AuC (Asset under Control) are excluded.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo
Hi Vivek,
hey are not using network activity.They directly create PR and put WBS into it .
My concern is while entering WBS element , we can have the authorization check .
User who have the authoizaion for the WBS element can creae the PR.
Vaibhav
Hello experts,
We are implementing PS for a construction company, the requirement is Cash Flow report from PS, now the issue is Funds Management has been activated and i have also read other queries in the forum that if Funds Management is activated then PS Cash Management cannot be activated, so if this is the issue, is this possible through Funds Management itself and what are the drawbacks if PS cash management cannot be activated? Please guide and correct me where am i going wrong. Thank You
Regards
Ashwin
Hi,
As you said, we can control project access by maintaining the ACL Admin/Write/Read authorizations. But user can create PR/PO for any WBS element even though he is not access to that project/WBS element. Please correct me, if I am wrong.
Regards,
Our Client is using is QTY proportionality method for progress analysis.In this method, the aggregation of the POC is not happening to the superior level WBS in spite of maintaining the required SKFs & Value categories for POC aggregation & Non Aggregation.
I would like to understand,"Is this a std behavior of this measurement method?"
Hello Clara, I'm also triying to understand this scenario....because, not settling plan values to AuC has some impacts at profit center accounting... how would you differentiate or segregate PS values derivated from investments and CO values derivated from other operations, if they for example share the same chart of accounts? First thing that comes to my mind is to create a series of specific profit centers to attach investments objects (wbs, orders, etc), that would be correct?
Hello Ansar, could you please share the note number that you applied?
Thanks in advance.
Hi Prakash,
Please refer following SAP note
Note 417511 - (FI) Collective note for PS Cash Management
Note 701075 - FAQ 2: PS-Cashmanagement
Regards
Tushar
Hi Clara,
The reason being currently we do not settle our CAPITAL PROJECTS to the AUC’s created in actual, which cause our process for PLAN and ACTUAL transfer recoveries in SAP PS (IT) to be different. This again caused variances on the reporting when actual and Plan amounts are matched.
Regards,
Hi PS guru's,
We are facing problem in AUC which is getting created automatically while creating L-5 WBS element.
User has deactivated all the depriciation area , and this AUC has been created on 2011, now when user is trying to create WBS element for thsi project system is giving Error CJ824 -Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element.
Please provide some solution .
Regards,
Sandeep V
Thank you vrkumar,
can you please elaborate more, which material type we use for such items
How the wbs element should be delivered wheather by VL01n or CNS0
AT my client place we are not using Milestone billing as there is prepayment process which is a country specific requirement.
Please explain how the process will look like with my requirement?
Message was edited by: Mohamed Rafi - There are many threads which deals about SD PS integration, spend time in searching and referring those.
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.
Is it instead of a modification maybe possible to copy the constraint-dates via a development? I can see that in FM CO_BO_OPR_SEQ_COPY is an enhancement point. Did somebody tried already to copy here the constraint-dates?
We're considering to copy completeley planned networks which have dates already maintained. In the new network only some of the dates shall be changed manually.
Thanks,
GM
Hi Experts,
In CM50, i can have either weekly and daily view based on the setting of period profile in overall capacity profile for workcenter.
My requirement is for some work centers i need to have daily view and some other work centers i need to have weekly view.
Can we restrict this by project profile or plant?Please help me in this regard.
Thanks,
Dileep
Hi Dileep,
CM50 uses overall profile as SAPSFCG020. This has differant sub profiles including period profile and time profile. see transaction OPD0. You could go to the OPD0 transaction and enter overall profile SAPSFCG020. Click on Details button on the application tool bar/Double click on overall profile SAPSFCG020. This navigates to the sub profiles screen. Here you can find period profile.
SAP___P002 : Gen: Daily period split.
Please check if this could be helpful to your case.
Regards, Gordon
Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the reply.
When i change period profile as weekly or daily,in CM50 accordingly i am getting weekly view or daily view for all work centers.Is it possible to restrict the daily or weekly view based on work center or project profile etc.
Thanks,
Dileep
Hi Experts,
I want to be more clear on the requirement.As we know CM50 uses overall profile as SAPSFCG020,
For some work centers i need to change some settings in Overall profile like period profile, time profile etc...Even i tried to create a new Overall profile with my settings and assigned to project profile, still CM50 is working as per SAPSFCG020 profile.This profile is ok for some work centers.But for few work centers i want to have different setting in overall profile.Is it possible?
Thanks,
Dileep
Hello Ryan, I do not get any error messages. The WBS's just do not generate any settlement rules. And you discover this when you try to settle in cj88 because you get messages saying settlement rules have not been maintained for these WBS's.
Hi Gokul, in "Determine Strategy for Settlement Rule" auto generation should occur for billing elements and account assignment elements. And the acct assignment category is to generate settlement rule from superior WBS.
Upon running the cjb1, I get no error messages and the detailed list is as in the image below. Recipient remains empty. Any suggestions?
Can anyone help with this. I have run settlement successfully for several periods. My expense account and my settlement gl when added together result in a zero balance meaning settlement is complete. In period 15 however, after running settlement, I do not have a zero balance when I add my expense account and my settlement gl together. A value remains given the impression that some items have not been settled or did not settle completely but when I ran settlement, all costs were successfully settled. Any ideas?
To illustrate what I mean:
On posting expense to the project, my project account 6XXXX0 is debited e.g +700
On running settlement, my settlement account 6X0001 is credited e.g -700
And my AUC account 1XXXXX debited +700
So upon adding up 6XXXX0 & 6X0001, I should have a zero balance.
I have reviewed the line items in the GL accounts and I cannot see a debit on the expense account (6XXXX0) for a particular line item, but this value has a credit posted against the settlement gl (6X0001) resulting in the non zero balance when both accounts are added together. Why is this and where is it settling this value from? Any ideas?