Hi Hamayet,
Refer this thread, whether this is helpful
Regards
Terence
Hi Hamayet,
Refer this thread, whether this is helpful
Re: WBS: Budget Availability, Settlement to AUC, Direct Settlement vs Multilevel settlement
Regards
Terence
Hi Pradeep,
you can use the same BAPI along with Goods Movement BAPI.
for details check below Links:
Error BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE when using movtype 281 reservation
How to pass custom movement type to BAPI - BAPI... | SCN
thanks
Sunil
Dear Hamayet,
I am also facing with same issue . I have a 3 level of WBS & I am tried to settle the 1st level WBS to cost center as all cost are roll up to first level , but it it gives error Maintain settlement rule of sender & if i assign settlement rule for lower level WBS &sender as upper level WBS then system is throwing error of Item 001 WBS element xxxxxxx Budget exceeded , message no. BP604. I thinkitmay be roll up double cost to upper level WBS from lower level WBS.
Now I don't understand that whether I am doing something wrong process or system error because I am doing this process first time . Please help anyone ASAP.
Thanks ,
Virendra
Hi Terrence,
Yes I checked
For above ORD 5120XXXX is consuming budget.
The total consumption for jobs for report S_ALR Report shows the figure with 1.04 Million.
But when individually finding values these ORD types cannot be accounted for.
Hi,
Can you please share the screenshots of the difference you are finding ?
It is difficult for us to comment without the same.
Regards
Terence
Toliver,
Oddly, my business users have recently noticed this and asked me about it. I have looked about and have not found any definitive information confirming that this is by design. I have also not been able to find any settings that would do as you wish (my business users would also like this).
For now, let's see if anyone else can provide any insight into this.
Cheers,
Tony in Ottawa, Canada
Hi,
If i understood correctly, you say this order is having actual 1.04 million, but when you check the order it is not showing.
If that's the issue, check whether there are any sub orders linked to this order, you need to drill down to the lower level to analyse further.
What is CJI3 is giving, is this same or different ?
Regards
Terence
Dear Virendra Pal
Do you please share the config. path to resolve this issue? How to exclude the settlement cost element from Budget?
Rasel
Bangladesh
Hi,
I've finally found the fix to this issue:
OSS Note: 2055642 - Missing fields in field selection; jump to incorrect field when double-clicking
Hope this helps someone!
Thanks,
Mike
Hi Kir,
Then you shouldn't get the error. ...There might be some validations in place which is causing this error. though the message is coming from standard SAP..Please check with your FI counterparts
also check if this note help..
Note: 141224
Privet Kir,
Within same CO area it should not be a problem. Also Company Code is not a mandatory field on the project definition unless it is made mandatory in customizing.
Regards,
Pav
Dear,
In FB50 we need to post with respect to single company code.If you have multiple company codes, you need to change company code whenever posting for different company code.
in FB50 out put screen -->Edit-->Change company code or press F7 on FB50 out put screen.
Kindly try with this.
Regards,
Pardhu
Privet,
The problem is that cross company posting isn't configured. And FI department says that that's not suitable for their configuration.
With Company Code on project defenition i tried many varieties. When creating Project it asks for CO or CC or Plant, When i fill one of those fills it asks for CC anyway. How can i leave it blank? May be some ticks in OPSA? No obligatory customizings for fiels has been made.
I do exactly like this.
Switching to Company 'B', selecting 2-nd level WBS (with CC 'B') but created in Project with CC 'A'.
Got the KI100 Error message 'The CO account assignment object belongs to company code A, not B'
Actually there should be no problem even if you have the default Company code at the project definition level too, as soon as your particular WBS is assigned to another Company code.
Maybe your problem (as mentioned by Pardhu) is just because your Company code is defaulted when you are trying to post FI GL document? So, you need to switch to another Company code and next try to post for that Company code.
So the message is not related to the Company code on the project definition, but to the fact the system has that Company code in the document header for FI GL posting that was defaulted either from a parameter or from previous postings.
Hi Kir,
Check this document, may be this can be useful for you.
Cross-Company/Inter-company transactions
Regards
Terence
I usually change CC in FI GL document posting to the same that written on WBS . This is what results errors.
If I post FI/GL with CC 'A' to WBS 'A' (Project Definition 'B') = Error KI100
if I post FI/GL with CC 'B' to WBS 'A' (Project Definition 'B') = Everythings fine because CC 'A' matches what's written on Project defenition... And all WBS in this project has this CC defualt by system, no matter what value i enter in Requesting Company Code for wbs.
Now it's also a problem to Create Purchase order with the similar error.
Hi Kir,
I feel its better to talk to a FI Consultant. Also request your ABABer to check it, since this can give an insight whether this is custom logic or the validation which was created.
You can also check with SAP ERP Financials
Regards
Terence
Hi
Check if the following note may be helpful for you.
998849 - KI100 with account assignment to WBS element
Regards,
Sudhakar*