Thanks Vengaiah,
I checked the table you mentioned, and found the table change log. I have one more question, our customer has run the IM27_Close by mistake, and I also checked the IM53 and the budget seems correct. so is there any potential error? How should I make the correction or just leave it?
thanks,
Simon
Hi Simon,
Which year he closed... if it is 2015 and you don't have any new to be approved in 2015. Then it is ok.
Thanking you
Vengaiah
Got it, So the only effect is that we cant update the budget in 2015， right?
yes...
many thanks！
Hi All,
I tried searching forums and Google but not found relevant one for my requirement.
As of now, at the end of every month, we are creating Project versions for all valid Projects (through one Y/Z Transaction Code which have call transaction code CN71 BDC written inside). Here user is giving input only for one field 'Period' as 'YYYYMM' and then click on execute. System creates Project versions for all valid Projects for that Period. But this process takes too much time, user needs to keep session open and not possible to schedule this Y/Z Transaction code as background job.
My requirement is to create Project versions for all active Projects (Not closed, not deleted) with minimum user inputs. I tried searching BAPI but not found relevant one.
Could you please share if you come across such kind of requirement and solution ?
Thanks,
Swapnil Kharul
Hi Swapnil,
I think your z program is using call transaction method in BDC. Can you please check with your developer , whether he convert it to bdc session method. BDC session can be run in background.
Thanking you
Vengaiah
Hi Vengaiah,
We tried converting it to BDC session and running it in background, but it takes too long time and after which the job gets cancelled. Hence, still issue remains. Could you please suggest ?
Thanks,
Swapnil Kharul
You can change your validation check as below:
PROJ-PSPID :1-9: = '1235/BCDS'
Coding masks symbols are not counted, so PROJ-PSPID :1-8: = '1235BCDS'
Hello,
anybody have an idea ?
Thanks for your help.
Using Services for Object is not a good idea as a document management solution. It is a quick and easy way to get documents into the system but if you are planning on loading many documents it is a bad idea.
DMS solutions usually have s document repository outside of the system.
Standard SAP DMS is to use a Document Information Record (DIR) to link between the object (WBS, NWA, etc.) and the document repository.
You are limited what you can do with Services for Object. I don't know of anyone who has enhanced it.
Hi,
When you assign the documents to Milestone, system will display documents at the Top level of the WBS element.
Documents which are assigned at Milestone will be displayed at corresponding top level like Activity or WBS element
As suggested by KEN, DMS is the best option for attaching documents, since the Service of Objects will affect system performance.
Regards
Terence
Hi All,
I have a question about the field selection for WBS elements.
Is it possible to have different kinds of field selections for WBS elements used in projects of varied nature.
For example, projects of one type (customer projects) needed to have the field "Billing Element" as an input field. But the project meant for say investments should have this field disabled.
I tried and realise that this is not achievable. can you please confirm if this is possible or not.
If not possible, is there any other way of handling this requirement.
Hi,
Is the project type is same for both the scenarios.
Go to OPUK and click influencing for WBS elements, you should be able to see certain selection by which you can filter.
Have you checked it earlier
Regards
Terence
It is standard PS configuration to do what you are asking. It's called influencing in the field selection configuration. You can have Project Type influence how field selection is set up or you can use WBS Level or a number of other influencing fields.
Hi Gurus,
I have trouble about shifting activity, i try to imitate function ms.project automatic reschedule.
Act Start Finish
Activity10 02.11.2015 03.11.2015
Activity20 04.11.2015 05.11.2015
Relation between activity FS, Activity 20 as successor.
I try to extend finish date activity10 through CJ2B to 10.11.2015.
why activity20 did not reschedule to 11.11.2015(Start) 12.11.2015(Finish)?
please can someone help me to give me solution, what should i do?
best regards,
michael a
Hi,
We are trying to transport the WBS Screen Layout (over ECC 6.0) but still getting the same error.
The Transport Request is moved successfully from the source client to the destination client, but the effects of the same is not reflecting in the system.
The mentioned SAP notes :
383310 - Flex.detail screens_ Customizing was not transported;
384771 - PS - problems with flexible detail screens
364476 - Flexible detail screens_ layout is not saved; is also not serving the purpose.
Could anyone please help.
Regards,
Akash.
Hi Sam,
Logically budget is to control expenses, -ve amount is posted either via certain reversals or revenue postings so why this control is required?
If you need -ve budget reporting then you can use budget return transaction for -200 and display the same in report S-ALR_87013560.
Please share the screen of P2E client for CJ30 txn with -ve budget.
Hi Akash,
Try this once ,
Goto define layouts of wbs element detail screen.
Click on table View .. Select the Transport option, Create a new transport request.
From below screen shot , select all button or you can select only the one's you want transaport press button Include in request.
Move the Tr to target system and check.
Thanking you
Vengaiah
