Hi Tushar,
CJEN I tried earlier but still mismatch is there. S_ALR_87013543 is matching with CJI3 and do shows the variance against Production order settlement, which is equal to the diff between CJI3 & Cn41.
Any other clue?
Reg
Rahul
Hi Tushar,
CJEN I tried earlier but still mismatch is there. S_ALR_87013543 is matching with CJI3 and do shows the variance against Production order settlement, which is equal to the diff between CJI3 & Cn41.
Any other clue?
Reg
Rahul
Try creating a custom program to fetch the required fields form CATSDB and update it in COEP as a new line. Make sure this line has certain attributes or key fields which help you identify that the entries here were updated as a result of running the custom program.
Hello,
thanks for your reply. We had already tried for the same with CMOD (CNEX0009), but the same is not triggering. If there is any other solution with BADI and User EXIT.
Thanks,
Chetan
Hi Mander,
Could you kindly try CJIC it gives the settled data based on WBS element provided in the selection screen.
Hope this helps you..
Regards,
Vadiraj K
Hello Vadiraj ,
Thank you for your reply
When I understand , the behaviour that he does is standard.
He only copies the P.1000 in the WBS element and after -0000 no changes will be done on WBS.
I have read about an user exit CNEX0033.
Do you know this ?
Davy
Hi Parimal Kaujalgikar,
I have met the same problem just as you said.
Do you have got a solution for the Cross Company procurement with project stock?
Looking for your reply!
Alex Ding
From SHANGHAI
2013.08.06
hi
CN52N is good report having all important details of project procurement material components only including stock items.PO numbers does not exists against the Purchase Requisition along with price/currency, but all other details useful during project planning/execution.
ME2J - is about project POs (all material components + external services)
ME5J - is about project PRs (all material components + external services)
Good afternoon my friends. Once again I'm here to ask for your help. I am new in module project system (PS) and would like to know if there is a way to create strategies realese for projects (CJ20N) or is there a way I can approximate to get two people to approve a project?
hugs
Thanks, very useful information.
Regards,
Atilano.
Hi Sumant,
CJI3 can help us.. but the actual value and values settled in AuC will appear row wise, sub totaling to 0,
our management wants the same in values in 3 different coloumns.
Thanks and Regards,
Mandar.
Hi Vadiraj, Thanks for your reply. In CJIC there is only 1 field for WBS, ie we can get the values for 1 WBS at a time where as i need list of WBS in one coloumn, and its actual values and setted values in repective coloumns, is it possible? Regards, Mandar Mahuli.
You can use status profiles for your requirement.
Neither class or class type is available unlike Release Strategy for Purchase Requisition / Purchase Order.
Experts can share if any strategy available for Project so that it can be used as approval.
Hi Milton,
I assume you have checked the things i mentioned in my reply earlier.
Before deeming any functionality weak i would suggest you to first understand how all the three reports function i.e.what tables are being accessed and what logic is being considered to fetch the required data. You can take help from your ABAPer and find these things out.
My information from SAP help says that CN52N gets figures only for PR/PO's that are raised by way of attaching material components to the project structure. You can verify this by running a small test case i.e by creating a material document through project and creating the other directly using MM tcodes. Check all the 3 reports you mentioned and let us know what you find.
Regards,
Gokul
Hi PS-Experts,
I have hundreds of relationships in which I have to change the factory calendar. Is there a transaction or programm which supports me in doing this?
CNMASS does not offer a possibility to change the factory calendar in relationships.
Regards,
Mike
Hi All,
There is one business scenariot where external employees will be working on the different projects , there would one purchase order created for each employee with single line item and account assignment to cost center. Now the requirement is that each employee will fill the timesheet in CATS and this shall lead to the confirmation of activities in PS along with the service entry sheet created in MM-SRV. And, also importantly activity confirmation should happen with the PO price and not by cost center and activity type rate(KP26).
I implemented the note 456720, but it is not helping completely. Process i am follwing is ; in CAT2 i am entering PO number , PO line item , Network and activity.I have also maintained info type 0315 . After this i am running CATM and CAT5, but the problem what i am facing is that network/activity is getting confirmed by KP26 rate whereas requirement is that system should pick PO price .
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
I totally understand the logic above but again I am left a little understated by the lack of integration between PS and PP/MM.
The idea of an integrated systems is that all modules should compliment each other and I feel PS is lacking in the integration where you want to use PS as 'overlay' rather than big bang.
The fact that ME2J is 'Purchasing docs through Project' rather suggests a connection with SAP PS. then you go to SAP PS in CN52N and you cannot see the same data - weak. It means that we have had to develop CN52N to meet our need when to a business users this seems straight forward functionality.
My point is it should not matter whether we are driving through a project procurement or MM if there is a WBS element connected it should pick it up. I am sure I am not the first to complain of the lack of real integration in the SAP PS module
Hi Milton,
Besides suggestion by our friends, did you check Commitment report - CJI5?. Check CN52N report output for any filter options if set delete those ones.
In my opinion, POs raised through PP orders also would be displayed if account assigned to WBS element.
Try ME2K - which will only fetch the account assigned related purchase orders.
Not sure what happened from your end please check once again.
Thanks,
Sudhakar
Message was edited by: Sudhakar Pappu
Hi,
Do not use the network and activity only use PO number and line item.
Thanks,
Sudhakar
Hi
You can use the User status profile and define two different statuses (example, one status is for Review and other one is for approval) by two authorities at different levels before releasing the project. Also you need to define two single roles and assign these authorization objects to enable one role for review and one for approval.
Discuss with your basis team for more information on setting up roles and building authorization objects.
Please check the forum for setting up user status profile because lots of discussions have been taken place in the past on this kind of issues which would give you more insight.
Thanks,
Sudhakar