Hi,
For certain new Project/WBS ,We released then Locked certain WBS because we are not ready for them to be used right away.
Nothing is posted to that WBS yet.
When we run settlement(CJ8G) , get the error - Actual settlement is not allowed .
Why is this WBS picked up when nothing is posted to the WBS?
Thanks in advance.
hi,
in hierarchy of wbs elements if your wbs is sub wbs of locked one then system not allow you to post settlement.
sulabh
Hello,
I am doing Result analysis through KKA2 transaction code. System is showing POC calculation in 2 decimal eventhough 3 decimal is vailable. System is diplaying third decimal as ZERO.
Actual Costs 12,433,226,244.54
Planned Costs 13,140,000,000.00
POC (%) 94.621
But in KKA2 system showing POC (%) 94.620
So i need to show that third number.
Pls. help me to resolve the issue.
Thanks and regards
Amit mistry
Use CJI3 to review postings, drill to accounting docs. Clerk may have posted a change manually.
Hi,
If nothing is posted to that wbs, then there is no need to lock that WBS for settlement purpose.
Also, if any actuals have been posted, then create one more settlement profile with "not for settlement" option and set this profile in that particular wbs as a parameter.
Hello Abdul
Can the Operative indicator be somehow changed after postings are carried out?
Rgds
Hi Amit,
This is standard behaviour. The reason is POC is calculated internally with the accuracy of two digits. It's however displayed with the use of a filed with 3 digits. This implies that the third digit displayed is ALWAYS 0.
I must say that POC calculated (that with the 2-digit accuracy) is never used for a calculation.
It's only for the information purpose. When calculating (for example) revenues, the data is calculated as follows.
R(c) = Actual costs/Planned costs * R(p).
Thus, the accuracy is not lost here. POC = Actual costs/Planned costs is saved in a field with two digits and then displayed in the output screen and in full logs.
Regards, Gordon
Hi Manish,
Thanks for the reply. This looks like a feasible approach.
Regards,
Amith Anand
Hi Experts,
Thanks for the reply. I have done the changes through ABAP by implementing a exit to change the overall capacity profile based on work center.Now it works.
Thanks,
Dileep
All,
My Company did Implements SAP note 955107 to change the commitment check from PR to PO and is working fine. A subroutine Pool program created with the name "ZBPFCI21" and find below is the coding.
********** Code Begins**************
PROGRAM ZBPFCI21.
FORM include_pr_commitment
CHANGING cd_flag_pr_commitment_avac LIKE sy-datar.
* Do not consider purchase requisition commitment
* in availability control.
CLEAR cd_flag_pr_commitment_avac.
ENDFORM.
********** Code Begins**************
For some reasons, my company wanted to reverse the process back to PR to do the commitment check. I tried to suppress the above coding through debug mode, it does bring back the Commitment check to PR and through the error message as per Tolerance value set in the config when exceeding the budget.
Question: Are there any other changes needed in order to reverse back the process back to PR commitment check or suppressing the code suffice the requirement. Not sure whether the same topic is discussed earlier.
Thanks,
G. Kannan
Hi All,
I have created a report having all the parameters same as the standard S_ALR_87013542. According to the requirement I have expanded only the Cost Element instead of WBS as in standard.
Report requirement is based on Variation as Cost Element. When I run the report the out put is coming with respect all the cost elements connected- showing the WBS Elements, Planned Cost, Actual Cost & Committment along with the Totals column for Planned+ Committment.
I am having two issues;
1. I am unable to get the WBS ID instead I am getting description of the WBS.
2. I am unable to get the Totals of the Actuals, Planned & Committment row at the bottom.
One more serious question is, Is it appropriate to get report based on Cost Element. I am worried about the data consistency. Mostly all our standard reports are based on WBS as main parameter. I am trying other way round now.
Thanks in advance.
Mohan R. Desai
Hi Gurus,
I am not getting Planned POC and actual POC values for activities in progress analysis report.
I am using cost proportionality method for planned POC for activities and degree of processing for actual POC for activities .
for WBS elements estimation method is used for both planned and actual POC, i am getting values for WBS elements but i am not getting POC values for
Activities.
Please provide the solution.
Regards
satya
Hi Keerthi,
Enhancement CATS0002 (CATS: Supplement recorded data) should be of use to you.
Regards,
Fearghal
Hi Ryan,
This enhancement is to modify the recorded time entry(CAT2), but i want to update COEP table when CATM posting occurs. Could you please clarify.
Regards,
Keerthi
Dear Clara,
Thanks for your additional info. I did check the my system and unable to find the program ZBPFCI25. Hope there are no issues.
I do notice the note 955106 implemented at various program to point ZBPFCI21.
Will update this forum if there are any further issues I face while suppressing ZBPFCI21.
Once again Thanks to Clara & Gokul Pillai.
Best Regards,
G. Kannan
Hi Vadiraj,
Thanks for the input, however the difference is appearing after filtering Business Transaction not equal to KOAO only. Anyother way?
Reg,
Rahul
Hi Rahul,
Try to run CJEN and check if results matches in CN41 as compated to results in CJI3 after excluding Business transaction relevant for settlement.
You can also verify the results in S_ALR_87013543.
Regards
Tushar
Dear Murad,
in PS the Plant is not a standard authorization object, but yuo can add an object as explained in http://scn.sap.com/thread/1516779
Best regards,
Roberto
Hi Gokul,
Checked with RPSCO and values are matching with CJI3. For GR55 however I am facing some issues and will update you with the findings on this.
Reg
Rahul.
while running IMccp3 i get the error
annual budget negeative
Budget/Release was changed -Rebuild avalability control if neceessary
what may be the reason & solution